Re: [DIYbio] Re: Student subject to criminal proceedings when he uploaded anothers thesis to a share site

Well I wonder what it feels like to have someone steal years of your life, it took many years of hard work for me to write my thesis and wouldn't want others to simply take my work out of my hands.

On Thursday, May 25, 2017 at 9:12:28 AM UTC-5, Abizar Lakdawalla wrote:

After three years of court proceedings in Colombia, a judge in Bogotá acquitted a graduate student yesterday (May 24) of charges he violated copyright law by sharing another researcher’s masters thesis online for a study group. If he had been found guilty, 29-year-old Diego Gomez could have faced years in prison.

“This case must spark a serious debate over the necessity of Open Access,” Carolina Botero, director of an organization called Fundación Karisma, which has been helping Gomez with his legal case, said in a press release sent to The Scientist. “Today we celebrate that justice was made in an absurd case that could have set a bad precedent for access to knowledge in Colombia.”

Gomez was studying biology at the University of Quindio in Armenia in central Colombia several years ago when he uploaded another student’s thesis to Scribd, a digital library and e-book and audiobook subscription service. Unlike in the United States, copyright violations in Colombia are a criminal act, and the thesis author pressed charges.

“When uploading the thesis I never thought I was violating any law,” Gomez told The Scientist in 2014. “This type of literature is not of commercial interest, so I never thought I could do any damage to the author. On the contrary, I thought that I was giving him benefits on sharing his work.”

Colombia’s copyright law was born out of an agreement with the United States, intended to bolster trade. “Diego’s story also serves as a cautionary tale of what can happen when copyright law is broadened through international agreements,” the Electronic Frontier Foundation, an advocacy group for free speech and Internet access, posted on its website today. “But as is often the case when trade agreements are used to expand copyright law, the agreement only exported the U.S.’ extreme criminal penalties; it didn’t export our broad fair use provisions.”